For more information
on meetings, agenda, minutes, draft regulations, and future
meetings, please go to the following:
1) www.michigan.gov/cis/
2) click on MIOSHA (on the left-hand sidebar link)
3) click on Standards & Regulations (on the left-hand
sidebar link)
4) click on Ergononics Standard Advisory Committee Activity
(middle of page)
December
1, 2004
Nothing
significant happened at the last meeting on November 4, 2004.
There is no meeting scheduled for December. The next meeting
is January 26, 2005.
October
29, 2004
The regulatory
spotlight is on Michigan to see if the MIOSHA standards process
results in the second mandatory ergonomics regulation in the
country. The Congressional Review Act removed the OSHA final
rulemaking on ergonomics in April 2003, before the first compliance
deadline. Late last year voters in Washington State struck
down their ergonomics regulation a few months before the effective
date. Currently, the only ergonomic standard being enforced
in the country is in California.
In the
fall of 2003, MIOSHA was directed by a Joint Steering Committee
of the General Industry and Occupational Health Standards
Commissions to create an Ergonomics Advisory Committee. The
Advisory Committee has been meeting approximately monthly
for the past year to develop language for a proposed ergonomics
standard in Michigan.
The Ergonomics
Advisory Committee is much larger than the typical standards
advisory committee. Currently there are five Labor representatives,
six Management representatives, two Public representatives
and two Technical Advisors, and a Safety Standards Commissioner
acting as liaison to both standards commissions. John Bavin,
Industrial Hygienist with Consumers Energy is a member of
the Advisory Committee.
Discussions
during the first few meetings of the Ergonomics Advisory Committee
included other options besides a mandatory standard, including
outreach or voluntary ergonomics guidelines. In January of
2004 both of the Standards Commissions clarified the direction
to the Advisory Committee, which is to develop a mandatory
standard, not guidelines or outreach. For a proposed standard
to continue through the process beyond the Advisory Committee,
there must be a consensus among Committee members, not a majority
vote of Committee members.
The standards
promulgation process in Michigan involves 30 steps. Step #3
is the drafting of rules by an Advisory Committee, which is
where the process has been for the last 12 months. This is
not an overnight process. Assuming the Advisory Committee
reaches consensus on proposed language for a standard, there
are numerous legislative hurdles and formal reviews before
a proposed standard goes to public hearing.
The draft
language developed so far by the Advisory Committee is listed
below. I urge you to review the draft as well as future revisions,
which will be posted on the MIOSHA web site. [Go to www.michigan.gov/cis/
then click on "MIOSHA", then click on "Standards
and Regulations".] Also posted are dates of future Advisory
Committee meetings and minutes of those past. Advisory Committee
meetings are open to the public. Anyone attending a meeting
is welcome to express their views to the committee. Please
get involved in the process by attending an Advisory Committee
meeting and voicing your views, or email John Bavin with your
comments or concerns.
John P
Bavin
Corporate Industrial Hygienist
Consumers Energy
jpbavin@cmsenergy.com
DRAFT
ELEMENTS OF A MINIMAL PROCESS
Ergonomics Advisory Committee
September 22, 2004
Training
1. All
general industry employees shall be given ergonomic awareness
training that covers:
a. What
are ergonomic hazards, risk factors, and injuries.
b. The
process for communicating that an ergonomic hazard has been
recognized.
c. What
to do when an ergonomic hazard is recognized and how to
avoid an ergonomic injury.
2. Records
to document training shall be kept.
Exposure
Assessment
1. An
employer shall have ergonomic risk factor assessment mechanism
and it shall be kept current.
Employer
and Employee Involvement
1. Employers
and employees should be involved in the overall ergonomic
process.
2. There
shall be no discrimination for reporting a hazard.
[tentative until researched]
Risk
Reduction
1. There
shall be a process to control or, where feasible, reduce ergonomic
hazard. |